Photography

Photography tips, techniques, methods, strategies and photographer’s resources.

Pet and Wildlife Photography

parrot.jpgTrying to photograph animals is great fun, but challenging While it may only have been ten minutes, it felt like an eternity when trying to get a good shot of this vocal and precocious parrot. Every time I had him in focus and thought I had the perfect shot lined up, he would hide his head under his feathers, preen, or turn his back on me.

Finally, with the unintended help of a very young boy who was also following his every move, I managed to get my shot. The parrot had been squawking loudly, intermittently, and, in exasperation, the little boy blurted out “shut up, my mother tells me to shut up all the time”! The bird peered over at him and that’s when I got my photo. “Thanks”, I muttered. He looked up and very matter of factly said - “he was too loud”! Here’s where you can read more on improving pet photography.

The shot was taken on my digital Nikon 70s, even though I had my mid 1980’s Nikon FG with me at the time. I chose digital that day for speed of shooting. In the time it takes to advance film one frame, I swear I can fire off two with digital. As with bracketing your shots if you were shooting with film, the more shots you take, the better your chances of getting “the one”.

I put my camera on auto mode for the day as I knew there wouldn’t be time to make too many adjustments for each individual shot. Once again, a plus point for using digital. I was playing tourist at The Alligator Farm in St. Augustine, FL and the place was pretty crowded. I set the camera to allow me manual focus with the aid of a built in diopter. I have an inherent distrust of auto focus on any lens because I figure it knows nothing of what my subject matter really is! I also opted to use the JPEG Normal setting. While I was sacrificing resolution, it allowed for more photos. I now wish I’d selected the JPEG Fine setting on the camera instead. I still would have been able to take all that I wanted and spent less time tweaking them in the digital darkroom.

Another choice for using digital here was that I knew the colors of this magnificent bird would be captured. Had I used the Kodak 200 ASA film, the results would be excellent as well. It’s a lot easier to tweak the color with digital, whereby each film type has it’s own hue > cool to warm, and anywhere in between. I’ve wondered what the difference in detail might be? I still think film would win. There’s that little things called the pixel, that digital can never get beyond, although I still fantasize about having had a digital Hasseleblad with me that day and take that very same shot!

I also developed a new found admiration for what wildlife photographers had to know in order to get that one shoot that says it all. I was lucky - I was in an aviary, and while these birds were not captive, their food source was there and they had gotten quite used to humans, so you could seek out an interesting shot in little time. Additionally, the sunshine was splendid and I was able to get several keepers that day.

Contributed by Eileen Hennessy

Access to wildlife stock photography.

Follow Me On Twitter
Powered By: TweetMyBlog!





6 Comments


  1. Becky Taylor

    Eileen, I liked your parrot story. I find taking pictures of animals most challenging. Just when you’ve got the shot they move. I’ve missed more great shots just being a second too late. I also agree that digital is never as good as film. The color in film is always more brilliant because of, like you said, pixels. Good article! Becky



  2. Dave Corn

    I like the bird shot! The colors are great! Keep up the good work!
    Dave Corn


  3. Thanks so much for the story Eileen and the wee push to keep trying for that moment, that just eludes those of us with less patience to try a little harder.
    Animals are where my photography gets the most practice probably because of having no option but to sit and wait out the beasties shyness or curiousity, either way you can’t beat a little outside help like the little boy you spoke of.
    Thanks again and lovely shot by the way!
    Suzi.


  4. Fun story and I agree totally with the film vs digital scenario from my experiences. And, yes a Phase 1 or Kodak medium format digital back woul possibly made the difference but then dollars vs enjoyable shooting. I gather here it was the capture of the scene, which is great, for personal use and not a design team criteria that demanded a particular direction for size and color (hue, saturation, etc). Kudos to Eileen..



  5. Onkar Singh Plaha

    HI Eileen, Your picture of this parrot is very good and quite inspiring. I am not particularly a nature or wild life photographer but I guess if one knows driving, one can drive most any car. I have tried to shoot birds in my back garden but due to nature of birds not to stay still has caused me to give up. And they have this tendency to always place themselves in a location as if to intentionally make it difficult for photographers ( I mean far away and in the darkest of shadows). You have done a wonderful job and at the same time have inspired me. Thankyou and congratulations. Keep it up and enjoy !


  6. What a coincidence! I was in St. Augustine this weekend and took photos of the same parrot! Then I found your article! Isn’t the net awesome.

    Dave


Leave a Reply



Close
E-mail It